In 2023, my group and I started engaged on maybe one of the formidable content material audits ever performed on the HubSpot Weblog. We’ve run content material audits up to now — however not like this.
We ran the audit in three phases:
- Section 1 addressed our oldest content material.
- Section 2 evaluated our lowest-performing content material.
- Section 3 assessed the worth of our subject clusters.
When it was all mentioned and carried out, we audited over 10,000 weblog submit URLs and over 450 subject clusters.
On this submit, I’m going to deal with section certainly one of our audit. I’ll stroll you thru how we audited our oldest content material and the way we took motion. Plus, I’ll share the outcomes we discovered.
However first, let me offer you some background on why we determined to run an audit of this magnitude.
Why We Audited
It began in early 2023. On the time, my group was referred to as the Historic Optimization group and we sat on the intersection of HubSpot’s search engine optimisation and Weblog groups.
We had been accountable for updating and optimizing our current weblog posts and discovering progress alternatives inside our library. (We’ve since advanced into what’s now the EN Weblog Technique group.)
In case you’re new right here, the HubSpot Weblog is HUGE.
For context, the weblog was residence to 13,822 pages in February of 2023, the month we started our audit.
Whereas we’re lucky to have a excessive area authority and drive thousands and thousands of visits monthly, having a weblog of this measurement doesn’t come with out challenges.
As our library ages, the quantity of alternative for brand new content material throughout our weblog properties and clusters shrinks.
So, we determined to audit our library to seek out alternatives for optimization.
We hypothesized that we may uncover “greenspace” and “quasi-greenspace” — subjects that we’ve coated however haven’t capitalized on that properly — by auditing the oldest 4,000 URLs in our library.
Though this was solely a couple of third of our content material library, we believed we’d have the ability to unearth some visitors alternatives and provides our weblog a lift.
Across the identical time, we began to really feel the consequences of Google’s March 2023 Core Replace that emphasised expertise, which our Technical search engine optimisation group instantly began addressing.
Nonetheless, one other a part of that algorithm replace emphasised content material freshness and helpfulness. In different phrases, how cutting-edge and helpful our content material is to our readers.
That is the place we actually felt a way of urgency.
As a result of we had 4,000 URLs with printed dates starting from 2006 to 2015, we already knew that this chunk of content material was not recent or useful.
So, we set to work and audited these weblog posts over the course of ten weeks.
Finally, we added phases two and three to our plan so we may additional handle unhelpful content material and clusters.
How We Audited Our Oldest Content material
1. Outline our objectives.
Earlier than we began auditing the content material, it was vital for us to find out the goals.
For some publishers, the objective of a content material audit might embrace enhancing on-page search engine optimisation, enhancing person engagement, aligning content material with advertising and marketing objectives, or figuring out content material gaps.
For this specific audit, it meant uncovering “greenspace” and “quasi-greenspace” in our weblog library, and enhancing our general content material freshness.
We additionally needed to decide the scope of our audit.
There’s no proper or incorrect technique to method this. Relying in your objectives and the scale of your web site, you would audit the entire thing in a single go.
You could possibly additionally begin with a small portion of your website (corresponding to product pages or particular subject clusters) and construct out from there.
Since HubSpot has such a big content material library, we opted to restrict this audit to our oldest 4,000 URLs. Not solely was this extra manageable than reviewing all of our content material in a single audit, however this additionally focused URLs that had been extra more likely to profit from an replace or prune.
We additionally did this figuring out that we’d later handle the remainder of our library throughout phases two and three.
2. Collect our content material stock.
As soon as we established our objectives and scope, we needed to collect the oldest 4,000 weblog posts and put them right into a spreadsheet.
This course of can differ relying on the instruments and CMS you employ. Right here’s how we did it utilizing Content material Hub:
1. Log into HubSpot and navigate to the Weblog web page in Content material Hub.
2. Navigate to the Actions drop-down and click on Export weblog posts.
3. Choose File format and click on Export. This may ship all your weblog submit data to your electronic mail. Additionally, you will get a notification in HubSpot as soon as your export is prepared.
4. Obtain your export and open it in your most popular spreadsheet software program (I’m normally a Google Sheets girlie, however I had to make use of Microsoft Excel because the file was so giant).
5. Assessment every column within the spreadsheet and delete those that aren’t related to your audit. We instantly deleted the next:
- Publish search engine optimisation title
- Meta description
- Final modified date
- Publish physique
- Featured picture URL
- Head HTML
- Archived
6. As soon as the irrelevant columns had been eliminated, the next remained:
- Weblog identify
- Publish title
- Tags
- Publish language
- Publish URL
- Creator
- Publish date
- Standing
7. Filter the Publish language column for EN posts solely. Delete the column as soon as the sheet is filtered.
8. Filter the Standing column for PUBLISHED solely. Delete the column as soon as the sheet is filtered.
9. Filter the sheet by Publish date from oldest to latest.
10. Spotlight and replica the primary 4,000 rows and paste them right into a separate spreadsheet.
11. Title the brand new spreadsheet Content material Audit Grasp.
When you’re feeling fancy, you too can create a customized report in Content material Hub and choose solely the fields you need included within the audit so that you don’t should filter as a lot when organising your spreadsheet.
3. Retrieve the info.
After compiling all the content material wanted for our audit, we needed to acquire related information for every weblog submit.
For this audit, we stored it fairly easy, solely analyzing whole natural visitors from the earlier calendar yr, whole backlinks, and whole key phrases.
We did this as a result of our advisable actions for every URL had been decided throughout post-evaluation. (We’ll cowl this within the subsequent step.)
We obtained natural visitors information from Google Search Console and used a VLOOKUP to match every URL with its corresponding variety of Clicks.
Then, we obtained backlink and key phrase information by way of a key phrase analysis instrument.
4. Consider the content material.
Subsequent, we assessed each bit of content material through the use of the collected information. Then, we evaluated the submit itself to find out the next:
- Sort of Content material
- Freshness Stage
- Natural Potential
Sort of Content material
The HubSpot Weblog is residence to many various kinds of weblog posts, every serving a novel goal. Labeling every submit helped us decide its relevance and have become a key consider our determination to replace or prune.
Whereas this isn’t an exhaustive checklist of all of the content material sorts you would discover on the HubSpot Weblog, we narrowed it right down to the next for the needs of this audit:
- Instructional: A subject that may educate the person on a ache level or downside they know they’ve.
- Thought Management: A subject that may educate the person on a ache level or downside they didn’t know that they had till an skilled drew it to their consideration.
- Enterprise Replace: A HubSpot-related piece of stories or a press launch that’s probably not evergreen.
- Newsjacking: An industry-related piece of stories or a press launch that’s probably not evergreen.
- Analysis: A set of knowledge or the outcomes of an experiment that’s used to teach the reader. This subject might or is probably not evergreen, however the content material is just not and wishes updates to remain recent.
Freshness Stage
As a result of the posts on this audit hadn’t been up to date in a very long time, none of them might be thought of 100% “recent.” Nonetheless, we took various kinds of freshness under consideration when figuring out what motion wanted to be taken on the URLs.
For instance, some subjects, corresponding to Google+, are so outdated that an replace could be foolish. Nonetheless, loads of subjects had been nonetheless evergreen, though our content material was not.
The next scale helped us make choices on whether or not the URL had worth with regard to freshness:
- Outdated: The subject is outdated, and an replace is probably not doable.
- Stale: The subject is evergreen, however it could want an intensive replace to make the content material extra aggressive.
- Comparatively Contemporary: The subject is evergreen, and it could solely want a average replace to make the content material aggressive.
Natural Potential
To find out the natural potential of every URL, we needed to ask ourselves the next query: Will anybody seek for the content material on Google?
- Sure: Somebody would positively seek for this, so we’ll must optimize/recycle the content material.
- No: Somebody wouldn’t seek for this. There’s no level in optimizing/recycling the content material since there’s no doable focus key phrase.
For all the posts marked “Sure” for natural potential, we advisable a spotlight key phrase for the re-optimized content material to compete for. We did this by evaluating the prevailing title, slug, and content material. Then, we did some key phrase analysis and reviewed the Google SERP for that question.
We additionally included the main focus key phrase’s month-to-month search quantity (MSV) to assist prioritize which updates to carry out first.
For an additional layer of warning, we additionally checked for cannibalization on all posts marked “Sure” for natural potential. There are a number of methods to do that:
- Do a website search and see if any URLs come up for the main focus key phrase.
- Use a key phrase analysis instrument to cross-reference whether or not every other posts in your website are rating. (That is the quickest/most correct technique.)
If the main focus key phrase was flagged for cannibalization, we both discovered a special focus key phrase or famous that the URL needs to be redirected to the more energizing submit.
If no cannibalization was discovered, then we had the inexperienced mild to maneuver ahead with updating the submit.
5. Suggest an motion.
As soon as a submit was utterly evaluated, we turned the insights into motion objects.
Every URL was positioned into one of many following classes:
- Hold: No motion is required as a result of each the content material and the URL are good.
- Optimize: The content material is nice however outdated when it comes to freshness or search engine optimisation practices. Hold the spirit of the article, however refresh and re-optimize to enhance efficiency.
- Recycle: The content material is just not salvageable, however the URL nonetheless has worth (when it comes to backlinks or key phrase alternative). Create new content material from scratch, however retain the URL.
- Prune: Neither the content material nor the URL has worth from an natural standpoint.
Audit Insights
Out of the 4,000 URLs we audited, 951 (23.78%) had been categorized as posts with natural potential and advisable for optimization or recycling. Moreover, 2,888 URLs had been advisable to be pruned. That’s about 72.2% of the audit.
These posts both didn’t have natural potential, posed a cannibalization threat, or had been so outdated that there was no level in updating them.
The remaining 161 URLs both didn’t require any motion or had already been redirected.
How We Took Motion
The motion taken for a URL was decided by its potential for natural visitors.
The URLs with natural potential had been delivered to our Weblog group and advisable to be optimized or recycled.
In the meantime, the URLs with no natural potential had been delivered to our search engine optimisation group and advisable to be archived or redirected.
First, let’s stroll by means of how we took motion on the posts advisable to be optimized or recycled.
Taking Motion on Content material with Natural Potential
Earlier than addressing any of the 951 posts with natural potential, we would have liked to determine the next:
- Our capability for strategic evaluation and transient writing
- The capability of our in-house writing employees and obtainable freelancers
- Our capability to edit the updates
We coordinated with stakeholders and decided we solely had the bandwidth to replace 240 posts in 2024 (along with the handfuls of weblog posts we replace every month). This initiative was internally generally known as the “De-Age the Weblog Undertaking” and was led by my EN Weblog Technique teammate Kimberly Turner.
As soon as we knew what number of posts we may tackle, we needed to slim down which of them to prioritize. We did this by evaluating the complexity of the elevate required for every submit replace:
- Easy Replace: The content material updates wanted are comparatively mild, making them appropriate for freelancers.
- Complicated Replace: The content material updates wanted are heavy, making them higher fitted to in-house writers.
- Recycle: Content material is just not salvageable, however the URL is. Rewrite the submit from scratch, however retain the URL.
- No Alternative: Cross on updating.
We initially prioritized updating the best URLs first, however later pivoted our technique to deal with the URLs with the very best MSV potential, no matter replace complexity.
We did this as a result of we wished to get essentially the most we may out of our updates.
De-Age the Weblog Outcomes
Initially, we projected that these updates could be full by the top of H1 2024, however we needed to shift our technique … once more.
Like many different publishers, we felt the consequences of Google’s March 2024 Core Replace in addition to the introduction of AI Overviews.
After having positioned the De-Age the Weblog Undertaking on maintain whereas we addressed the problems, we deprioritized the undertaking totally in favor of higher-impact workstreams.
search engine optimisation, am I proper? It at all times retains you in your toes.
Regardless of sunsetting the undertaking earlier than it was full, we had been nonetheless in a position to carry out 76 submit updates. Six months after the updates had been carried out, the cumulative month-to-month visitors for these posts had elevated by 458%.
This goes to point out that even updating a small portion of URLs could make an enormous distinction.
Taking Motion on Content material with No Natural Potential
Whereas the De-Age the Weblog Undertaking was going down, we additionally took motion on the two,888 URLs that had been advisable to be pruned.
Because the preliminary audit didn’t embrace suggestions on tips on how to prune, we had to return and re-review every URL to find out how we’d prune.
Right here’s how we evaluated the posts:
- Archive (404): The URL has lower than 10 backlinks and the backlink profile doesn’t have worth.
- Redirect (301): The URL has greater than 10 backlinks and/or the backlink profile has worth.
When selecting a brand new URL, we did our greatest to choose essentially the most related and related web page. If we couldn’t discover one, we redirected to the pillar web page of the cluster that the submit belonged to.
If for some motive, the URL didn’t belong to a cluster or there wasn’t a pillar web page, we redirected it to the HubSpot Weblog homepage.
Choice-making for some content material sorts was simpler than others. For instance, we had been in a position to robotically assign 301 redirects to URLs that had been flagged for cannibalization throughout the preliminary audit. We additionally robotically assigned 404s to URLs with lower than 10 backlinks labeled as Newsjacking and Enterprise Updates.
All the pieces else was manually reviewed to make sure accuracy. To make the analysis course of simpler, we adopted this determination tree:
It took my group about two and a half weeks to make sure that each URL had the right label. Ultimately, we had 1,675 URLs assigned to be redirected and 1,210 URLs assigned to be unpublished and archived.
As soon as every URL was evaluated, we had been lastly able to take motion.
After coordinating with Rory and Principal Technical search engine optimisation Strategist, Sylvain Charbit, we determined to prune the URLs in batches as a substitute of suddenly. That means, we may higher monitor the influence of redirecting and archiving a big amount of content material.
Initially, we deliberate to implement our prune in 5 batches over 5 weeks, permitting us time to observe efficiency throughout the weeks in between.
Batches one and two contained URLs meant to be archived and unpublished, and batches three by means of 5 contained URLs designated for 301 redirects.
As a result of there have been so many URLs to unpublish and archive, we labored with builders on HubSpot’s Digital Expertise group to create a script that might robotically unpublish and archive URLs and redirect them to our 404 web page.
Then, we had been in a position to implement the 301 redirects with the Bulk URL Redirect instrument in Content material Hub.
Notice: Though we had been in a position to work by means of this course of internally and end earlier than our deadline, I wish to acknowledge that manually evaluating over 2,000 URLs will be tedious and time-consuming.
Relying in your sources and the scope of your audit, you might wish to think about hiring a freelancer to assist your group work by means of a job this huge.
Content material Pruning Outcomes
Whereas we efficiently carried out every batch, this course of didn’t come with out a few street bumps.
Halfway by means of our pruning schedule, Google rolled out the March 2024 Core Algorithm Replace. We ended up putting our pruning schedule on maintain so we may higher monitor efficiency throughout the replace.
As soon as the replace was full, we resumed the remainder of our prune till it was full.
Due to the unstable search panorama in 2024, we didn’t see the visitors beneficial properties we’d hoped to see as soon as the prune was full. Nonetheless, we did have fun an enormous win for general content material freshness on the weblog.
At first of our audit in 2023, we calculated the freshness of our content material library by every URL’s publish date and quantifying the variety of days since they had been up to date.
For instance, say the present date is November 12, 2024, and you’ve got a submit that was final up to date on February 19, 2008. Primarily based on the 2024 date, the submit from 2008 is 16.7 years outdated or 6,110 days.
As soon as we had all the ages for each submit on the HubSpot Weblog, we averaged these numbers to find out the common age of our content material library, which was 2,088 days (5.7 years).
Since pruning 2,888 URLs (and updating lots of of URLs from the audit and past), the HubSpot Weblog’s common age has dropped to 1,747 days — that’s 341 days youthful than once we began.
As content material freshness and helpfulness play a good higher function in search algorithms, being almost a yr youthful could make an enormous distinction.
What’s Subsequent?
Earlier on this submit, I discussed that this audit is just one of three that my group has labored on in 2024.
Our section two audit focuses on the lowest-performing posts that weren’t included in section one, totaling over 6000 URLs. Then, section three assesses the worth of our Weblog’s subject clusters.
We’re nonetheless taking motion on the outcomes from these audits, however I’m so excited to share the method and insights once they’re full.
In the end, content material auditing is a job that’s by no means really carried out — particularly when working with giant libraries. You end one audit, then it’s on to the subsequent.
Though the work will be tedious, the rewards of enhancing content material high quality, person expertise, and efficiency make it definitely worth the effort.
